At my visit this week to the Supreme Court I was surprised and impressed by how interactive, direct and even blunt the justices were with their questions. They interrupted, cut to the point and dispensed with niceties. They seemed to want to get to the heart of the arguments.
I was struck by how informal and conversational their questions were, despite the potential for imperiousness that might be expected with the setting and the justices’ power. With all written arguments having been submitted in advance, the discussion did not follow a scripted path – no PowerPoint! Each side had just 30 minutes to make their case, yet at the end it seemed like they had enough time to present their core arguments.
If at the highest level of our judicial system we can have a productive discussion of fundamental issues, I think we should find ways to shorten business meetings.
